Search for: "DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm
Davis both expect that 3M’s latest lawsuit in Washington D.C. will fail, just as its prior two efforts failed in the New York court.3M Company v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 11:25 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury’s award of $3 million in damages in Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:09 am
District Court recently.In Sierra Club North Star Chapter v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:18 am
[Plaintiff] has demonstrated that a person of ordinary skill in the art can determine the scope of those claims that include an intent requirement by reviewing internal design documents or through witness testimony." 3M Company, et. al. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
July 3, 2023, settled) SEC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
The '983 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled 3M et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
The '983 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled 3M et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Parke, Davis & Co., 507 P.2d 653, 660 (Cal. 1973). [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Ø Title VII v. the First AmendmentAvila v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
